It doesn't just guard agreements. It catches manipulation.
Every incoming claim about money, scope, or deadlines is checked against everything you've actually agreed — and the quieter plays, like 'we never agreed to that,' get caught with the receipts.
Claims, verified against your record — in seconds
A fast keyword pass clears the ~80% of email that's routine at zero cost. Anything that asserts a term gets the deep pass: the claim is extracted, your history is searched across every connected source, and a reasoning model returns a verdict — supported, contradicted, or unverifiable — with the exact sources and dates.
- Two-pass design: free keyword filter, then deep analysis only where it's warranted
- Cross-references email, calendar, and connected tools — not just one thread
- Every verdict carries its sources and a confidence score
The quieter plays, named
Beyond contradicted facts, it watches for manipulation patterns: gaslighting about what was agreed, blame quietly shifted onto you, deadlines drifting after the fact, commitments talked down, and a contact's tone turning from partner to adversary. Each alert fires only when the language pattern AND your recorded reality both hold — warnings with evidence, never paranoia.
- Gaslighting, responsibility-transfer, deadline-drift, commitment-inflation and more
- Two-factor precision: a linguistic trigger plus contradicting history, together
- Reads your stored reality only — it never invents a concern
Exposure, a counter-reply, and a hard stop
For payment disputes it estimates the cash-flow exposure with its methodology shown, then drafts a correction in your voice citing the dated sources. While that flag is active, autonomous sending is frozen on the thread — so the AI can never quietly 'agree' to the new terms on your behalf.
- Directional financial exposure, methodology always shown (not legal advice)
- Counter-reply drafted in your voice, citing specific dates and sources
- Autopilot freeze on any flagged thread — enforced in code, not settings
Good to know.
Does it read every email?
A no-cost keyword pass runs on everything; only the small fraction that asserts a term, scope, or deadline goes to the deeper analysis. Personal email is excluded entirely, in code.
What if it's wrong about a risk?
Every flag shows its sources so you can judge in seconds, and a one-tap ✓/✕ on each decision trains its calibration over time. It only flags when both a language pattern and contradicting history hold, which keeps false alarms low.
Is the financial number legal advice?
No — it's a directional magnitude to help you prioritize, with the calculation shown. It's decision context, not a legal opinion.
See it on your email.
Connect Gmail and it reads your last 90 days. Your first brief shows you what it already found.
Start free — connect GmailNo credit card · Personal email permanently excluded · Export or delete everything anytime