Check a new claim against the earlier record.
“We agreed to Friday.” “That was your responsibility.” “The extra work was included.” TaskFieldAI is being built to bring these statements alongside the relevant earlier messages, so you can inspect the difference before responding.
Limited test
A new message describes an earlier agreement differently.
Payment terms are Net-30 from invoice date.
As we discussed, invoices will be paid Net-60.
The new message says Net-60 was discussed. The earlier written confirmation says Net-30.
Needs confirmation: The available messages don't show a later agreement to Net-60, but one could exist outside email.
Read both messages
Confirming what we agreed on the call: payment terms are Net-30 from invoice date, invoiced monthly.
Thanks for the invoice. As we discussed, invoices will be paid Net-60, so expect payment in August.
See a clarification draft
Thanks for confirming receipt. Our 3 June email recorded Net-30 from invoice date. Could you point me to where Net-60 was agreed, so we're working from the same terms?
A draft for you to edit. Nothing on this page sends email.
Kinds of difference it looks for
Changed dates and terms
A delivery date, price, payment term or quantity that differs from an earlier message.
Changed ownership
A task or responsibility described as belonging to someone other than the earlier record says.
A denied prior statement
“We never agreed to that” when an earlier message appears to show agreement.
An unsupported claim
“As we discussed…” with nothing in the available history that matches.
Inconsistent instructions
Two requests that cannot both be followed, from the same thread or person.
How a finding is put together
A quick first pass
Incoming mail is screened for language about money, scope, dates and earlier agreements. Most messages stop here.
Search the history
For messages that pass, the specific claim is compared with related earlier messages from synchronized mail.
Show the evidence
The finding lists the statements that differ, links to the source messages and says what the record does not show.
A different statement is not automatically manipulation.The records may be incomplete, or a change may have been agreed elsewhere. The finding should help you ask a better question, not decide someone's intent for you.
Internally this capability is called Sentinel. Detection depends on which messages synchronized; it can miss differences and it can raise ones that turn out to be fine.
Questions
Does it decide who is right?
No. It shows the statements and sources that differ and what is missing. A legitimate agreed change is shown as such when the evidence supports it.
Can it tell whether someone is lying?
No. A mismatch between records does not establish intent. A useful finding shows the statements and sources that differ, leaving room for missing context, mistakes or an accepted change.
What if the change was agreed on a call?
Only if that information reaches TaskFieldAI through a supported record, such as a follow-up email. A calendar entry by itself does not contain what people said on the call.
Does a finding stop anything from happening?
While a serious finding is open on a thread, TaskFieldAI will not generate automatic drafts for that thread. You can still reply yourself.
Bring a thread where the terms moved.
We'll walk through how the current product would present it — the sources, the difference and what the record can't tell you.
An example or walkthrough comes first. Share private records only through an agreed, appropriate process.