Agreement$48,000 at stake
Alex Rivera's payment terms don't match your recordsTheir email says Net-60. Your signed agreement says Net-30. A corrected reply is drafted.Acme is your largest active accountReview TaskFieldAI for founders & executives
Your business lives in conversations.
Sixty relationships, all of them live, none of them written down anywhere. You are the only system of record your company has — and you are also the bottleneck, the single point of failure, and the person who was in every meeting.
One-click Google sign-in · Personal email excluded in code · Export or delete everything anytime
Nothing is going wrong loudly. The investor who has gone quiet, the customer whose scope crept, the partner who remembers the terms differently — none of them is in your inbox as a problem. They are in there as ordinary email.
The failure isn't attention It is arithmetic. Watching one relationship this closely is easy, and most founders do it instinctively for two or three. Sixty is past the limit, and no amount of discipline moves that number.
The seven questions you already ask.
You ask most of these every week, usually without getting an answer to any of them. Here is what comes back instead.
- What did I miss?Overnight it reads everything and ranks by consequence rather than arrival. What is left in the morning is the short list only you can settle, and each one says why it is on the list.
- Who am I supposed to get back to?Every request made of you is tracked with who made it and how long it has been sitting — including the ones buried three replies into a thread about something else.
- Did I actually agree to this?Every claim about money, scope or dates gets checked against your own record before you reply. When it doesn't match, you get the contradiction and the sources, not a feeling that something is off.
- What changed while I was away?Not what arrived — what became different. A date that moved, a term that got restated, a relationship that cooled, a promise that went past its deadline.
- Who is waiting on me?Commitments are tracked in both directions. You see what you owe and what you are owed, with the sentence that created each one.
- What do I need to know before this call?An hour before each meeting: the history, the open commitments on both sides, what changed since you last spoke, and anything unresolved. Assembled from your own record of the people in the room.
- Is anything here going to bite me later?Relationships are measured against their own baseline, so a deal cooling shows up as four signals moving together months before it shows up as silence.
TaskFieldToday · 4 need youExample workspace · illustrative data
Here's what matters.
Commitmentwaiting 2d
You promised Priya Nair a deck — it's 2 days overdueYou said “I'll send the updated deck by Friday” on June 4. Nothing has gone out.Priya is one of your key peopleSend it Opportunity
James Wilson is ready to moveHe replied in 9 minutes and asked for the contract. Relationship is 91 and rising.Fastest reply he has ever sent youOpen Forty-seven conversations were read. Three need a person. Each card carries why it is here, what is waiting on it, and what it holds up — because a list without those is just a differently-sorted inbox.
It will not speak for you uninvited.
It starts by drafting only. Autonomy is something you grant later, in steps, and can take back.
Investor emailDrafted in your voice, built from the last twenty emails you actually sent that person — not from a tone setting. Nothing goes out without you until you say so.
A thread with a risk on itFrozen. An active agreement flag stops autonomous sending on that thread entirely, the check runs before any AI call, and there is no setting that turns it off.
Personal emailExcluded in code rather than by a preference. Structurally out of reach, including from us.
When it isn't sureIt says so. A claim it cannot verify comes back unverifiable rather than fine, and a contact without enough history reads “not enough history”, never “healthy”. The full brief →
Straight answers.
Will it email investors on its own?
Not unless you grant it that, per category, after watching it draft for a while. Even then every send holds for five minutes, respects your working hours, and is blocked outright on any thread carrying an active agreement flag.
I'm the only person here. Is this built for a team?
Single-user is what ships today and it is the case this is designed around. Shared team memory exists as a roadmap item, not as something you are paying for now.
Can I tell it who matters most?
Yes — mark board members, key customers or investors and their conversations are surfaced first. But ranking is by consequence rather than by label alone, so an unmarked contact with $48,000 riding on a contradicted claim still reaches the top.
How long before it's useful?
It reads your last 90 days on connection, most recent first, and you can use it while that runs. Relationship baselines need roughly fifteen interactions per contact before they mean anything, and until then it says so rather than guessing.
You were in every one of those conversations.
Connect Gmail and it reads the last 90 days of them. Tomorrow morning you wake up briefed on what changed while you were building.
See what it findsNo credit card · Your data exports or deletes in one click