Commitmentwaiting 9d
You promised James an intro — it's 9 days lateYou said “happy to introduce you to their VP Eng” on August 12. No introduction has gone out.He has not chased itSend it TaskFieldAI for investors
You have the contact. Not the context.
Forty founders, each with a thread going back two years, each expecting you to remember what they said last quarter and what you offered to do about it. The names are in a spreadsheet. Everything that matters is in the mail.
One-click Google sign-in · Personal email excluded in code · Export or delete everything anytime
The intro you offered in March is the one thing from that conversation the founder still remembers. You have had a hundred conversations since. They have had one with you.
The problem isn't your CRM A pipeline tool records that a company exists and what stage it is at. It has nothing to say about the update that stopped arriving, the co-founder who left the thread, or the commitment you made in a subordinate clause on a Tuesday.
The seven questions you already ask.
You ask most of these every week, usually without getting an answer to any of them. Here is what comes back instead.
- What's happened here since we last spoke?Assembled from the correspondence itself: what changed, what was asked, what was promised on both sides, and what is still open — rather than from whatever the last update email happened to cover.
- What did the founder actually commit to?Commitments captured from the sentence that created them, with the date and the source, so “they said they'd have the hire closed by Q3” is checkable rather than remembered.
- Which founders have gone quiet?Measured against each founder's own cadence. A monthly updater who has missed two is a signal; a founder who has always been sporadic is not, and the system will not pretend otherwise.
- Who's waiting on me?Requests made of you are tracked with who made them and how long they have sat — including the intro you offered, which the founder has been too polite to chase twice.
- What changed in the portfolio this week?Not what arrived — what became different. Dates that moved, terms restated, relationships cooling, and commitments that went past their deadline in either direction.
- What do I need before this board call?An hour before: the history with the people in the room, open commitments on both sides, what changed since you last spoke, and anything unresolved.
- Which intro did I promise and never make?It is an overdue commitment like any other, and it surfaces the hour it goes late rather than the week you remember it — which is usually the week you next see them.
TaskFieldPortfolio · 3 need youExample workspace · illustrative data
Two commitments are overdue and one founder has gone quiet.
Relationship
Marcus has gone quiet on NorthwindMonthly updates for eleven months, then nothing for twelve days past the usual date.Two updates missed against his own cadenceOpen Waitingwaiting 2d
Priya is waiting on your notes from the board callAsked on June 4. Nothing has gone back, and the next board pack is being assembled.Blocking the board packReview Both directions. What founders owe you and what you owe them are the same object with the owner flipped — which is why the intro you forgot ranks alongside the update that never arrived.
It will not speak for you uninvited.
It starts by drafting only. Autonomy is something you grant later, in steps, and can take back.
An email to a founderDrafted from how you have actually written to that person before. Your relationships are the asset here, so nothing goes out under your name until you say it can.
A thread with a risk on itFrozen. An active agreement flag stops autonomous sending on that thread entirely, the check runs before any AI call, and there is no setting that turns it off.
Personal emailExcluded in code rather than by a preference. Structurally out of reach, including from us.
When it isn't sureIt says so. A claim it cannot verify comes back unverifiable rather than fine, and a contact without enough history reads “not enough history”, never “healthy”. The full brief →
Straight answers.
Does it work across a whole fund?
Not as a shared workspace. Each partner connects their own mailbox and gets their own view; there is no fund-wide rollup, and shared team memory is a roadmap item rather than something shipping today.
Will it send founders updates automatically?
Only if you grant that, per category, after watching it draft. Every send then holds for five minutes, respects your working hours, and is blocked on any thread with an active agreement flag.
What about founders who email me personally?
Personal email is excluded in code rather than by a setting, so mail on a personal account is structurally out of reach. Work mail from a founder is treated like any other work correspondence.
How does it treat a founder who was always sporadic?
As sporadic. Baselines are per-contact and built from roughly fifteen interactions, so cadence is judged against that person's own normal. Below that threshold it reads “not enough history” rather than inventing a score.
They remember the one thing you offered.
Connect Gmail and it reads your last 90 days of founder email. The first thing it shows you is what you owe.
See what it findsNo credit card · Your data exports or deletes in one click